Monday, April 28, 2014

Schwartz Financial Weekly Commentary 4/28/14


Schwartz Financial Weekly Commentary

April 28, 2014

 

The Markets

 

Newton’s third law says for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. Since things became tense between Ukraine and Russia, we’ve been getting a primer on the relative strength of diplomatic, economic, financial, and military actions and reactions.

 

Taking things over isn’t anything new for Russian President Vladimir Putin. A decade ago, he nationalized Yukos (a large publicly held Russian oil company) after jailing its founder for tax evasion and fraud. The financial repercussions of the takeover are still rippling through the global economy. In 2012, Russia lost a lawsuit filed by foreign shareholders of Yukos Oil and was ordered to pay damages.

 

Not long after the Yukos debacle, Putin lamented the demise of the Soviet Union was the greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the century. In 2014, he annexed Crimea – the first time a European nation has taken territory from another European nation since World War II – justifying the action in many ways, including by saying the Crimean peninsula should have been returned to Russia in 1991 when the Soviet Union dissolved. The West responded by imposing sanctions.

 

Today, Russia’s economy is in distress in part because of sanctions, according to Bloomberg BusinessWeek. Just last week, Standard & Poor’s knocked the country’s debt rating down to one level above junk, and Russia’s central bank raised rates for the second time since March significantly increasing the cost of borrowing for businesses and individuals. Inflation is high in Russia – above seven percent – although, as one economist pointed out, raising rates had little to do with inflation and much to do with supporting the ruble and discouraging the flight of capital from Russia. During the first quarter of 2014, $50 billion was pulled out of Russia, and estimates suggest that amount could rise to $200 billion by year-end depending on what happens in Ukraine.

 

The Russian central bank wasn’t the only one taking action last week. On Thursday, despite threats of further economic sanctions, Russia placed thousands of troops along the Ukrainian border for military exercises. Additional sanctions are likely to be imposed on Russia this week. We’ll soon have more insight into which actions speak the loudest.

 

Escalating tensions affected stock markets around the world last week, and many indices finished the week lower than they started.

 


Data as of 4/25/14
1-Week
Y-T-D
1-Year
3-Year
5-Year
10-Year
Standard & Poor's 500 (Domestic Stocks)
-0.1%
0.8%
17.5%
11.8%
16.8%
5.1%
10-year Treasury Note (Yield Only)
2.7
NA
1.7
3.4
2.9
4.4
Gold (per ounce)
0.2
8.3
-10.3
-4.6
7.5
12.6
DJ-UBS Commodity Index
0.3
9.8
4.1
-7.5
4.9
-0.6
DJ Equity All REIT TR Index
0.3
10.8
0.3
10.0
23.1
10.0

S&P 500, Gold, DJ-UBS Commodity Index returns exclude reinvested dividends (gold does not pay a dividend) and the three-, five-, and 10-year returns are annualized; the DJ Equity All REIT TR Index does include reinvested dividends and the three-, five-, and 10-year returns are annualized; and the 10-year Treasury Note is simply the yield at the close of the day on each of the historical time periods.

Sources: Yahoo! Finance, Barron’s, djindexes.com, London Bullion Market Association.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Indices are unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly. N/A means not applicable.

 

how long will you live? Life expectancy plays an important role in financial planning. It influences decisions about how much to save, invest, and/or insure to cover retirement, healthcare, long-term care, and other needs that may crop up over the course of a lifetime. Of course, there are some important nuances to life expectancy.

 

First and foremost, life expectancy changes throughout your lifetime. In 2010, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the average life expectancy for a newborn was 78.7 years, while a 65-year-old could expect to live to about age 84 and a 75-year-old to age 87.

 

Second, during the past two centuries, life expectancy increased by leaps and bounds. In the 1900s, most people didn’t live past age 50, according to the National Institute on Aging. By the end of the first decade of the 21st century, people were living beyond age 70. Not everyone’s life expectancy has increased at the same pace. A 2012 Brookings Institute article said:

 

“Analysts have long recognized the powerful association between personal income and expected life spans. People with higher incomes tend to live longer than people with lower incomes. Statistical tabulations suggest that the relationship is nonlinear. A $10,000 increase in annual income does more to lift the life expectancy of someone who lives on a meager income than it does to boost the life span of someone who is already well off.”

 

Gender plays an important role, too. While it’s true women have lived longer than men for decades, the gap has been closing. Since 1980, men’s life expectancy at birth has increased from 70 years to 76.2 years – a gain of more than six years. Women’s life expectancies at birth have increased from 77.4 years to 81 years – a gain of less than four years.

 

Life expectancy isn’t the only thing that can have a significant effect on your financial plans. If your plan hasn’t been thoroughly reviewed in the past year or so, you may want to contact your financial professional. It’s time for a planning checkup!

 

Weekly Focus – Think About It

 

One looks back with appreciation to the brilliant teachers, but with gratitude to those who touched our human feelings. The curriculum is so much necessary raw material, but warmth is the vital element for the growing plant and for the soul of the child.

--Carl Jung, Swiss psychotherapist

Value vs. Growth Investing (4/25/14)

-0.19
1.18
-0.42
4.13
20.25
14.04
19.55
-0.07
1.27
0.01
4.44
19.50
14.33
18.51
-0.12
2.26
-0.10
5.51
18.57
16.54
19.48
0.06
-0.50
-0.86
1.88
22.68
14.55
19.13
-0.16
2.20
1.05
6.17
17.31
11.96
17.04
-0.44
1.66
-1.19
4.02
22.27
13.50
22.29
-0.26
2.85
-1.05
4.66
21.08
14.12
22.78
-1.27
-1.14
-3.08
0.34
19.56
10.47
20.83
0.31
3.63
0.77
7.55
26.54
16.06
23.27
-0.71
-1.15
-2.74
1.14
22.19
12.39
22.05
-0.72
0.35
-2.66
3.11
22.24
11.47
21.15
-1.46
-5.56
-4.72
-3.56
22.42
11.19
21.17
-0.01
1.71
-0.92
3.82
21.90
14.57
23.77
-0.19
2.24
-0.47
5.17
19.32
15.71
20.32
-0.31
-0.96
-1.56
1.21
22.01
13.47
19.67
-0.06
2.45
0.86
6.28
19.50
12.97
18.74

 ©2004 Morningstar, Inc. All Rights Reserved. The information contained herein: (1) is proprietary to Morningstar; (2) is not warranted to be accurate, complete or timely. Morningstar is not responsible for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information and has not granted its consent to be considered or deemed an “expert” under the Securities Act of 1933. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.  Indices are unmanaged and while these indices can be invested in directly, this is neither a recommendation nor an offer to purchase.  This can only be done by prospectus and should be on the recommendation of a licensed professional.

 

Office Notes:

 

Take No Social Security payments

Until You’ve Learned How to Maximize Them

Over the past few months, I’ve sent you several articles about some of the critical mistakes people can make in retirement.  Another one of those mistakes is failing to maximize your Social Security benefits.

Why is this a mistake?  After all, you may have heard that Social Security is broken, or that it won’t be around by the time you retire.  But the truth is that Social Security is nothing less than a guaranteed stream of income, something no retiree should ever neglect.  Even better?  There are ways to maximize your Social Security benefits.  In other words, you may have the ability to increase your post-retirement income.  For these reasons, Social Security should and will play a large part in your retirement plan.  Failing to give your Social Security benefits the attention they deserve is basically just a way of denying yourself money for retirement. 

To help you avoid this mistake, here are …

Three Ways to Potentially Increase Your Social Security Benefits

1.   Delay collecting your benefits

Too many people rush to collect their Social Security benefits as soon as they retire.  This is sometimes a mistake, especially if you retire early.  Technically, you can begin receiving benefits as early as age 62, but if you do so; your benefits will be reduced significantly.  For example, if you were born between 1943 and 1954, your payouts would be reduced by 25%.  And the reduction isn’t temporary.  It’s permanent.

 

Waiting till your “full retirement age” is probably a better option—it means you won’t face any reduction.  What is your “full retirement age?”  It’s the age at which a person may first become entitled to “full” or “unreduced” retirement benefits.1  The following chart gives you the specifics:

Year of Birth
Full Retirement Age
1943-1954
66
1955
66 and 2 months
1956
66 and 4 months
1957
66 and 6 months
1958
66 and 8 months
1959
66 and 10 months
1960 and later
67

The latest you can begin collecting benefits is at age 70, and there’s good reason to hold off until then if you can afford it.  Benefit payments go up 8% for every year you wait after you reach your full retirement age up to age 70.  In other words, the longer you can keep your hand out of the cookie jar, the more sweets you’ll eventually receive. 

2.   Claim spousal benefits

This topic is very intricate—too intricate for a single letter.  So for now, it’s more important that you simply be aware of your options.  Another way to potentially maximize your Social Security is to claim a spousal benefit.  Married individuals can claim Social Security based on either their personal earnings record (in other words, their own work history) or on their spouse’s earnings record.  If a married individual chooses the latter, they would receive up to 50% of their spouse’s benefit. 

Why would you choose to claim Social Security based on 50% of your spouse’s earnings record rather than your own?  It’s simple: because you can claim whichever number is higher.  Be aware, however, that you cannot claim a spousal benefit until your spouse has filed their own claim. 

3.   Claim survivor benefits

Imagine a hypothetical couple, John and Mary.  Let’s say that both claimed Social Security based on their own earnings records.  Now let’s say that John dies of a heart attack, leaving Mary behind.  Under certain circumstances, Mary can file to receive John’s benefit, or increase her own benefit to the same amount that John enjoyed, if John’s number is greater. 

There are other ways to potentially maximize your Social Security benefits, too.  To learn about these, or more about the methods listed here, please feel free to give my office a call at 215-886-2122, or e-mail me at mike@schwartzfinancial.com.  I’d be happy to speak with you about your options.

 

Whatever you do, remember: Social Security is a guaranteed stream of income, and should figure highly into your retirement plan.  Don’t deny yourself the chance to earn more money for retirement!  

 

Regards,

,

Michael L. Schwartz, RFC®, CWS®, CFS

 

P.S.  Please feel free to forward this commentary to family, friends, or colleagues.  If you would like us to add them to the list, please reply to this email with their email address and we will ask for their permission to be added. 

 

Michael L. Schwartz, RFC, CWS, CFS, a registered principal offering securities and advisory services through Independent Financial Group, LLC., a registered broker-dealer and investment advisor.  Member FINRA-SIPC. Schwartz Financial and Independent Financial Group are unaffiliated entities.

 

This information is provided for informational purposes only and is not a solicitation or recommendation that any particular investor should purchase or sell any security. The information contained herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed.  Any opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice.  An Index is a composite of securities that provides a performance benchmark.  Returns are presented for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to project the performance of any specific investment.  Indexes are unmanaged, do not incur management fees, costs and expenses and cannot be invested in directly.  Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

 

* The Standard & Poor's 500 (S&P 500) is an unmanaged group of securities considered to be representative of the stock market in general.

 

* The DJ Global ex US is an unmanaged group of non-U.S. securities designed to reflect the performance of the global equity securities that have readily available prices. 

 

* The 10-year Treasury Note represents debt owed by the United States Treasury to the public. Since the U.S. Government is seen as a risk-free borrower, investors use the 10-year Treasury Note as a benchmark for the long-term bond market.

 

* Gold represents the London afternoon gold price fix as reported by the London Bullion Market Association.

 

* The DJ Commodity Index is designed to be a highly liquid and diversified benchmark for the commodity futures market. The Index is composed of futures contracts on 19 physical commodities and was launched on July 14, 1998.

 

* The DJ Equity All REIT TR Index measures the total return performance of the equity subcategory of the Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) industry as calculated by Dow Jones.

 

* Yahoo! Finance is the source for any reference to the performance of an index between two specific periods.

 

* Opinions expressed are subject to change without notice and are not intended as investment advice or to predict future performance.

 

* Past performance does not guarantee future results.

 

* You cannot invest directly in an index.

 

* Consult your financial professional before making any investment decision.

 

* To unsubscribe from our “market commentary” please reply to this e-mail with    “Unsubscribe” in the subject line, or write us at “mike@schwartzfinancial.com”.

Wednesday, April 16, 2014

Schwartz Financial Weekly Commentary 4/14/14


Schwartz Financial Weekly Commentary

April 14, 2014

 

The Markets

 

If you’re feeling whiplashed from the mid-week collision of good and bad economic news, you’re not alone.

 

On Wednesday, the Federal Reserve’s Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting minutes were released and investors were reassured by what they read. Although the Fed lowered its Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth projections for the first half of 2014, the minutes indicated real GDP is expected to grow faster over the next few years than it did last year (FOMC Meeting Minutes, Staff Economic Outlook, paragraph 1). In addition, “to support continued progress toward maximum employment and price stability, the Committee today reaffirmed its view that a highly accommodative stance of monetary policy remains appropriate” (FOMC Meeting Minutes, Committee Policy Action, paragraph 2). Reassurance the Fed would not increase the federal funds rate sooner than expected was received with gusto and all three major U.S. stock indices raced ahead finishing the day up more than 1 percent.

 

On Thursday, good news about the world’s largest economy (United States) ran right into not-so-good news about the world’s second largest economy (China). Economic indicators suggested China’s economy might be slowing faster than anyone expected. MarketWatch reported, “[China’s] Exports fell 6.6% from a year earlier, slower than the more-than-18% tumble in the previous month, but widely missing a Dow Jones survey consensus for a 4.2% gain. Imports were even uglier, plunging 11.3% – more than the 10.1% drop in February – and trailing far behind an expected 2.8% gain.” When trading ended on Friday, the Standard & Poor’s 500 was down 1.8 percent for the year, the Dow was off 3.3 percent, and the NASDAQ had lost 4.2 percent of its value.

 

When markets get dramatic, it may be a good idea to stay calm and remember one of the most basic tenets of investing: Buy low, sell high.

 


Data as of 4/11/14
1-Week
Y-T-D
1-Year
3-Year
5-Year
10-Year
Standard & Poor's 500 (Domestic Stocks)
-2.7%
-1.8%
14.0%
11.1%
16.2%
4.7%
10-year Treasury Note (Yield Only)
2.6
NA
1.8
3.6
2.9
4.2
Gold (per ounce)
1.6
9.7
-15.8
-3.5
8.2
12.4
DJ-UBS Commodity Index
1.2
8.5
1.0
-7.6
3.8
-1.0
DJ Equity All REIT TR Index
-1.1
8.1
-1.6
10.8
22.9
9.7

S&P 500, Gold, DJ-UBS Commodity Index returns exclude reinvested dividends (gold does not pay a dividend) and the three-, five-, and 10-year returns are annualized; the DJ Equity All REIT TR Index does include reinvested dividends and the three-, five-, and 10-year returns are annualized; and the 10-year Treasury Note is simply the yield at the close of the day on each of the historical time periods.

Sources: Yahoo! Finance, Barron’s, djindexes.com, London Bullion Market Association.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Indices are unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly. N/A means not applicable.

 

there’s a new index in town… About five years ago, the World Economic Forum’s Global Agenda Council proposed a new index be developed, one that would “increase the impact that social entrepreneurs, business leaders, and policy makers can have in the world.” The general idea was the new index would measure social progress and spur competition between nations to improve the environment for social innovation in much the way the Global Competitiveness Index assesses the drivers of economic productivity and prosperity and identifies nations that are most competitive.

 

Just 48 months later, the Social Progress Index (SPI) was born. The beta version of the index debuted in 2013 and focused on measuring the extent to which 50 countries met the non-economic needs of their citizens. The 2014 SPI gauged 54 social, health, and environmental factors across 132 countries, considering only outputs (like literacy) and not inputs (like spending on education). When the numbers were tallied, New Zealand was number one – even though it’s in 25th place when measured by GDP per person (SPI, pg 62).

 

According to The Economist, when the results of the SPI are compared with a country’s GDP per person, its value truly becomes apparent. The publication quoted Michael Porter, a professor at Harvard Business School, who said, "There is a view that economic development and social progress go hand in hand. That's true on average, but not in particular." For example, Costa Rica and Iran have similar GDPs, but Iran falls far lower on the scale of social progress. Brazil and Kuwait are about equal in terms of social progress, although Kuwait’s GDP per person is multiples greater than that of Brazil.

 

So, how did the United States do? We’re in 2nd place for GDP per person and 16th for social progress (SPI, pg 63). A New York Times Op Ed piece summarized the scores like this, “In the Social Progress Index, the United States excels in access to advanced education but ranks 70th in health, 69th in ecosystem sustainability, 39th in basic education, 34th in access to water and sanitation, and 31st in personal safety. Even in access to cellphones and the Internet, the United States ranks a disappointing 23rd, partly because one American in five lacks Internet access.”

 

Will the United States respond by improving the environment for social innovation as the developers of the index had hoped? Stay tuned. The results of the 2015 SPI will be out in just another year.

 

Weekly Focus – Think About It

 

The price of success is hard work, dedication to the job at hand, and the determination that whether we win or lose, we have applied the best of ourselves to the task at hand.”

--Vince Lombardi, former Coach of the Green Bay Packers

 

Office Notes:

 

What Does Wealth Mean to You?

 

George Giguere, who teaches a course on entrepreneurship at Brown University, recently asked this question to a group of students.  Not surprisingly, wealth meant different things to everyone. However, all wanted to be philanthropic at some point in their life and did not believe money would buy them happiness.

 

How much money would it take to make you wealthy?

 

While responses ranged from $1 to $10 million, the students were challenged to think further.  Giguere, a successful entrepreneur, has seen more people make it and then lose it, than make it and keep it. He teaches students the importance of keeping their word in business and treating people right.  “In creating wealth, you develop relationships along the way.  If you don't treat these relationships well, there is a probability that there is going to be a time to cash in on those relationships again and it is not going to be there for you when you need it,” says Giguere.

 

“You create a history in your life, and if you don't treat people with respect, you will pay the price for it one day.”  

 

Serious factors in determining whether someone is wealthy or not include how much he or she wants to spend, how the money will be used, and what needs are not being met. Real estate tycoon Donald Trump, who may seem to have unlimited needs, requires a lot of money to be wealthy by his own terms. Someone else with limited needs may be wealthy in his own right.  

 

Giguere notes the origin of wealth is important to mindset. People who win the lottery but have no concept of money tend to lose it right away. People who inherit money through a trust or earn it themselves but feel they were lucky tend to be more cautious in spending it.  People who deal best with wealth are those who gain it with confidence, did it themselves and know they can recreate themselves if things turn sour.

 

The words “success” and “wealth” are often used interchangeably. “It takes persistence and patience to achieve success. One does not work with the other," says Giguere.  It is important to set goals even at a young age. Doing so will help make you successful within your own definition.

 

Notes Mark Eisenson, author of Invest in Yourself: Six Secrets to a Rich Life,

"Once we become adults, we often lose track of life's simple pleasures and of our own personal goals. We take a wrong turn or two, and spend a good part of our lives doing things we'd rather not – while not doing many things we'd enjoy. Although we may obsess about how unhappy we are, we don't focus clearly on what we can do to change the situation, how we can invest our time and energy, and, yes, our money to consciously create the life we want.” 

 

So, what does wealth mean to you? 

 

Regards,

,

Michael L. Schwartz, RFC®, CWS®, CFS

 

P.S.  Please feel free to forward this commentary to family, friends, or colleagues.  If you would like us to add them to the list, please reply to this email with their email address and we will ask for their permission to be added. 

 

Michael L. Schwartz, RFC, CWS, CFS, a registered principal offering securities and advisory services through Independent Financial Group, LLC., a registered broker-dealer and investment advisor.  Member FINRA-SIPC. Schwartz Financial and Independent Financial Group are unaffiliated entities.

 

This information is provided for informational purposes only and is not a solicitation or recommendation that any particular investor should purchase or sell any security. The information contained herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed.  Any opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice.  An Index is a composite of securities that provides a performance benchmark.  Returns are presented for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to project the performance of any specific investment.  Indexes are unmanaged, do not incur management fees, costs and expenses and cannot be invested in directly.  Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

 

* The Standard & Poor's 500 (S&P 500) is an unmanaged group of securities considered to be representative of the stock market in general.

 

* The DJ Global ex US is an unmanaged group of non-U.S. securities designed to reflect the performance of the global equity securities that have readily available prices. 

 

* The 10-year Treasury Note represents debt owed by the United States Treasury to the public. Since the U.S. Government is seen as a risk-free borrower, investors use the 10-year Treasury Note as a benchmark for the long-term bond market.

 

* Gold represents the London afternoon gold price fix as reported by the London Bullion Market Association.

 

* The DJ Commodity Index is designed to be a highly liquid and diversified benchmark for the commodity futures market. The Index is composed of futures contracts on 19 physical commodities and was launched on July 14, 1998.

 

* The DJ Equity All REIT TR Index measures the total return performance of the equity subcategory of the Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) industry as calculated by Dow Jones.

 

* Yahoo! Finance is the source for any reference to the performance of an index between two specific periods.

 

* Opinions expressed are subject to change without notice and are not intended as investment advice or to predict future performance.

 

* Past performance does not guarantee future results.

 

* You cannot invest directly in an index.

 

* Consult your financial professional before making any investment decision.

 

* To unsubscribe from our “market commentary” please reply to this e-mail with    “Unsubscribe” in the subject line, or write us at “mike@schwartzfinancial.com”.